Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pada Materi Garis Singgung Lingkaran Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif

  • Febrianti Febrianti Universitas Mataram
  • Sudi Prayitno Universitas Mataram
  • Syahrul Azmi Universitas Mataram
  • Arjudin Arjudin Universitas Mataram
Keywords: problem solving ability, cognitive style, reflective, impulsive

Abstract

This study aimed to describe students' ability in solving the tangent of the circle problems based on reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. This type of research was descriptive research. The sampling of this study were 4 students of class VIII-4 SMPN 4 Mataram who consisted of 2 reflective students and 2 impulsive students. Students with reflective cognitive style have a very good level of problem-solving ability. This is shown at the stage of understanding the problem, thinking of a plan, and carrying out the plan have done very well. Meanwhile, students with impulsive cognitive style have a level of problem-solving ability with sufficient and fewer categories. This is shown at the stage of thinking of a plan, carrying out the plan, and at the time of re-examining the results of students' work that they have not been able to do well.

Author Biographies

Febrianti Febrianti, Universitas Mataram

Mahasiswa Program Studi S1 Pendidikan Matematika

Sudi Prayitno, Universitas Mataram

Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika

Syahrul Azmi, Universitas Mataram

Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika

Arjudin Arjudin, Universitas Mataram

Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika

References

Akbar, A., & Haidar, I. (2019). Profil literasi matematika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif. Prosiding seminar nasional pendidikan matematika II (SNPMAT II). Kendari: Universitas Halu Oleo Press.

Faradillah, A. (2014). The profile of junior high school students reasoning in solving mathematics open-ended problem according to reflective-impulsive cognitive styles. Proceeding of International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences, 113-120.

Hayuningrat, S., & Listiawan, T. (2018). Proses berpikir siswa dengan gaya kognitif reflektif dalam memecahkan masalah matematika generalisasi pola. Jurnal Elemen, 4(2): 183-196.

Kemendikbud. (2014). Permendikbud Nomor 58 Tahun 2014.

Muniroh, L., Sugiyanti, & Nursyahidah, F. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita ditinjau dari gaya kognitif impulsif pada masa pandemi covid-19. SENATIK, 352-359.

Nasriadi, A. (2015). Profil pemecahan masalah matematika siswa smp ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflektif dan impulsif. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 1-27.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standars for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Puspita, A. Y. A., & Wijayanti, P. (2016). Profil pemecahan masalah matematika siswa pada materi segiempat ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflektif dan impulsif. Jurnal MATHEdunesa, 3(5): 17-27.

Soeprianto, H., Prayitno, S., Hamdani, D., Apsari, A. R., & Wulandari, P. N. (2021). Desain pembinaan bakat matematika siswa smp untuk persiapan menghadapi kompetensi sains nasional. Jurnal abdimas (Journal of Community Service): Sasambo, 3(1): 32-40. https://doi.org/10.36312/sasambo.v3i1.391.

Stannard, P. L. (2003). Cognitive styles: a review of the major theories and their application to information seeking in virtual environments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(1): 54-66.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian & pengembangan. Yogyakarta: Alfabeta.

Susanto, H. A. (2015). Pemahaman pemecahan masalah berdasar gaya kognitif. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Turmuzi, M., & Hayati, L. (2012). Telaah kurikulum matematika. Mataram: Arga Puji Press.

Wahyuningsih, S., Sani, A., & Suia, M. (2019). Analisis proses berpikir siswa smp dalam memecahkan masalah matematik ditinjau dari gaya kognitif dan gender. Jurnal Pembelajaran Berpikir Matematika, 4(1): 121-132.

Warli. (2013). Kreativitas siswa smp yang bergaya kognitif reflektif atau impulsif dalam memecahkan masalah geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 20(2): 190-201.

Published
2021-12-30