Eksplorasi Konsep Segitiga pada Geometri Euclid dan Non-Euclid untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Siswa SMA

  • Indri Flora Br Ginting Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Kristiani Siagian Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Yolanda Angelina Sitorus Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Magrifah Rizki Berutu Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Putri Yade Bismeninta Br Barus Universitas Negeri Medan
  • KMA Fauzi Universitas Negeri Medan
Keywords: exploratory learning, Euclidean geometry, Non-Euclidean geometry, conceptual understanding, triangle concepts

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students' conceptual understanding of triangle concepts in Euclidean and Non-Euclidean geometry through the implementation of exploratory learning. The study was conducted using a quantitative descriptive approach involving 30 twelfth-grade students at SMA Methodist Antiokhia Pancur Batu. Data were collected through observation and a Likert-scale questionnaire consisting of 20 statement items based on four indicators, namely understanding of Euclidean geometry, understanding of Non-Euclidean geometry, conceptual understanding of triangles, and cognitive impact of learning. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques by calculating the mean score of each indicator, which generally fell into the high category (range 2.98–3.41), with understanding of Non-Euclidean geometry still slightly lagging behind the other three indicators. The key finding of this study is that exploratory learning effectively encourages students to build a deeper conceptual understanding of triangles through observation, analysis, and discussion, rather than relying on rote procedural memorization. More importantly, integrating Euclidean and Non-Euclidean geometry within a single learning sequence was shown to broaden students' way of thinking: students came to understand not only the properties of triangles on flat planes but also that these properties can change on curved surfaces, resulting in a more flexible and contextual understanding of geometry. These findings imply that an integrative approach combining Euclidean and Non-Euclidean geometry has potential as an alternative strategy for teaching geometry at the senior high school level to foster students' critical and analytical thinking skills, while also addressing the gap in Non-Euclidean geometry instruction that remains rarely introduced at the secondary education level.

References

Agusdianita, N., Widada, W., Afriani, N. H., et al. (2021). The Exploration of Elementary Geometry Concepts Based on Tabot Culture in Bengkulu. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Greenberg, M. J. (2010). Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries: Development and History (4th ed.). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

Herawaty, D., Khrisnawati, E., Widada, W., et al. (2020). Ethnomathematics in Geometry Learning: Development of Students' Spatial Understanding Through Local Culture. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Hidayat, W., & Sariningsih, R. (2018). Kemampuan pemahaman matematis dan minat belajar siswa SMP melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 3(1), 18–24.

Lugo López, C., Rodríguez, M., & Pérez, J. (2021). From Euclidean Geometry to Non-Euclidean Geometry, in Particular Hyperbolic Geometry, in Secondary Education Through Dynamic Geometry. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(14), 4611–4620

Piaget, J. (1972). The Psychology of the Child. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2019). Exploring students’ understanding of geometry through contextual learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 215–226.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Noviyanti, N., Sudirman, & Rodríguez-Nieto, C. A. (2025). Transformation of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Non-Euclidean Geometry Concept Through E-Learning Based on the Theory of Didactic Situations Using a Multiphase Mixed Method. Jurnal Innovatio: Journal for Religious Innovation Studies, 25(1), 1–18.

Nugroho, A., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Nurcahyo, A. (2021). The Weaknesses of Euclidean Geometry: A Step of Needs Analysis of Non-Euclidean Geometry Learning Through an Ethnomathematics Approach. Edumatika: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 93–102.

Nugroho, A., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Rochmad, & Wardono. (2022). Students' Spatial Ability in Learning Non-Euclid Geometry Through Ethnomathematics Approach. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 8672–8681.

Rahmawati, D., Nugroho, A., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2021). Exploring students’ understanding of non-Euclidean geometry using dynamic geometry software. Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(2), 145–158.

Ruseffendi, E. T. (2016). Pengantar kepada membantu guru mengembangkan kompetensinya dalam pengajaran matematika untuk meningkatkan CBSA. Tarsito.

Sari, D. P., & Wijaya, A. (2022). The effectiveness of exploratory learning in improving students’ conceptual understanding in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 145–158.

Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Widada, W., Herawaty, D., Jumri, R., & Wulandari, H. (2020). Students of the Extended Abstract in Proving Lobachevsky's Parallel Lines Theorem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Widada, W., Herawaty, D., Hudiria, I., et al. (2020). The Understanding of the Triangle in Lobachevsky Geometry Through Local Culture. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Published
2026-06-23
Section
Articles