Kajian Reflektif Teori Thorndike Dalam Konteks Representasi Matematis Berdasarkan Ideologi Utilitarian

  • Rila Septia Pratama Putri Rila Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Tian Abdul Aziz Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Keywords: Thorndike’s Theory, Mathematical Representation, Utilitarian Ideology

Abstract

Mathematical representation is the center of mathematics learning activities. Representations help students understand various forms of mathematical presentation. Strengthening mathematical representation in learning is based on learning theory, namely Thorndike Theory. American Educational Psychologist Edward L. Thorndike has a "Law of Effect" view which means that learning will be more successful if the student's response to a stimulus is followed by a sense of pleasure and satisfaction. Thorndike views learning as a stimulus-response formation process that determines the quality of learning outcomes. This research is a literature review with the aim of knowing what stimulates student representation, how teachers act so that students are able to create appropriate representations, and how students create appropriate representations. Various views on learning theory have emerged, one of which is utilitarian which views a good action as maximizing a sense of satisfaction and happiness. Representation in the formation of stimulus-response is intended for the success of learning mathematics that causes satisfaction. This paper attempts to shed the author's reflective thoughts on Thorndike's Theory in the context of mathematical representation based on Utilitarian ideology.

References

Amsari, D., & Mudjiran. (2018). Jurnal basicedu. JURNAL BASICEDU: Research & Learning in Elementary Education, 2(2), 52–60. https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu

Aziz, T. A., & Kurniasih, M. D. (2019). Fleksibilitas Representasi Eksternal Domain dan Range Fungsi. 10(1), 143–156.

Effendi, K. N., & Adirakasiwi, A. G. (2018). Diktat Belajar dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Karawang: Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang.

Ernest, P. (1991). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. Taylor&Francis e-Library, 2004.

Farahhadi, S. D., & Wardono. (2019). Representasi Matematis dalam Pemecahan Masalah. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 606–610. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/29071

Firdawati, I., & Hidayat, W. (2018). Hubungan Antara Keaktifan Belajar Siswa terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMK. 9(1), 151–158.

Firliani, Ibad, N., H, N. D., & Nurhikmayati, I. (2019). Teori Throndike dan Implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, FKIP UNMA, 823–838.

Goldin, G. (2008). Perspectives on Representation in Mathematical Learning and Problem Solving. Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education Routledge, 10872, 176–200. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930236.ch9

Hermansyah. (2020). Analisis Teori Behavioristik (Edward Thordinke) dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran SD/MI. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 7(1), 15–25.

Ibrahim, T., & Hendriani, A. (2017). Kajian Reflektif tentang Etika Guru dalam Perspektif Ki Hajar Dewantara Berbalut Filsafat Moral Utilitarianisme. Naturalistic : Jurnal Kajian Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(2), 135–145.

Kartini. (2009). Peranan Representasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY, 361–372.

Laila, N., Hidayat, W., & Hendriana, H. (2018). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis dan Keaktifan Belajar Siswa SMP. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(3), 395. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i3.p395-400

Marzali, A. (2016). Menulis Kajian Literatur. ETNOSIA : Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 1(2), 27–36.

Muasomah, L. (2013). Relasi Ideologi dan Pendidikan. Al -Absut; Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 6(1), 255–264.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standas of School Mathematics.

Sabirin, M. (2014). Representasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. JPIM IAIN Antasari, 1(2), 33–44.

Saepullah, A. (2020). Konsep Utilitarianisme John Stuart Mill: Relevansinya terhadap Ilmu-ilmu atau Pemikiran Keislaman. Aqlania: Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi Islam, 11(2), 243–261.

Sani, L. D. Y. (2019). Analisis Representasi Matematis Siswa SMA Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Materi Fungsi Trigonometri. Jurnal LEMMA, 5(2), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.22202/jl.2019.v5i2.3373

Sanwidi, A. (2018). Students’ Representation in Solving Word Problem. 7(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v7i2.p147-154

Setianto, I. E., & Risnanosanti. (2020). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP melalui Pendekatan Pembelajaran RME dan CTL pada Sub Pokok Bahasan Kubus dan Balok. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics and Natural Science Education, 1(3), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.35719/mass.v1i3.50

Tauhid, R. (2020). Dasar-Dasar Teori Pembelajaran. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 1(2), 32–38. http://jurnal.stkipkieraha.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/109

Uke, L. O. M. I. A. A. (2017). Teori Keadilan Kontemporer (Sebuah Kajian Teori Hukum). AL-’Adl, 10(1), 84–103.

Widiati, I. (2015). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Melalui Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 6(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.571

Yuniarti, Y. (2016). Peran Guru dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematik dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Eduhumaniora, 5, 1–8.

Published
2022-03-30
Section
Articles