Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Pada Materi Geometri Berdasarkan Level Berpikir Van Hiele Kelas VIII SMPN 2 Wanasaba Tahun Ajaran 2020/2021

  • Era Wati Sugara Universitas Mataram
  • Nyoman Sridana Universitas Mataram
  • Eka Kurniawan Universitas Mataram
  • Baidowi Baidowi Universitas Mataram
Keywords: geometry, problem solving, thinking level, van hiele

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe students' problem-solving abilities on geometry material based on Van Hiele's level of thinking in class VIII of SMPN 2 Wanasaba in the 2020/2021 school year. The method used in this study are tests and interviews. The results showed that the thinking level of students in class VIII D of SMP Negeri 2 Wanasaba was generally dominant at level 0 (visualization), as many as 13 people (48.14%) of the 27 students who took the test. In solving geometry problems according to Polya's stages, students who are at level 0 (visualization) have been able to do the stage of understanding the problem well but are still not perfect in making plans and implementing settlement plans. Students at level 1 (analysis) have been able to carry out the stages of understanding the problem, making plans and implementing plans, but in the stage of reviewing, students are not able to re-examine the results of the completion. Students at level 2 (informal deduction) are able to carry out the stages of understanding the problem, making plans, implementing a settlement plan and looking back even though they are not perfect at the stage of looking back. Students at level 3 (deduction) have very good problem solving skills, they are able to carry out the stages of understanding the problem, making plans, implementing plans and looking back appropriately and the calculation process is also carried out correctly. This shows that the higher the Van Hiele thinking level of the students, the better their geometric problem solving abilities will be.

References

Abdussakir. 2012. Pembelajaran Geometri Sesuai Teori Van Hiele. Jurnal Kependidikan dan Keagamaan, 7, (2), 1-12.

Adolphus, T. 2011. Problems of Teaching and Learning of Geometry in Secondary School in Rivers State Nigeria. International Journal of Emerging Sciences. 1 (2):143-152.

Ahmadi & Supriyono. 2013. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta

Chairani, Z. 2016. Metakognisi Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Khoiriyah, Nor. 2013. Analisis Tingkat Berpikir Siswa Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele Pada Materi Dimensi Tiga Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent dan Field Independent. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika:1-1.

Malinda, I. E. B. 2016. Analisis Proses Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Teori Van Viele. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 5(2):33. DOI: 10.33506/jq.v5i2.344.

Mulyana, Endang. 2003. Masalah Ketidaktepatan Istilah dan Simbol dalam Geometri SLTA Kelas1. Journal Psikologi Geometri: 1-1.

Musriandi, R. 2013. Model Pembelajaran Matematika Tipe Group Investigation Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Self-Concept Siswa MTS. Repository.upi.edu, 1-2.

Polya, G. 1973. How to Solve it. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Rohendi, D., Septian, S., & Sutarno, H. 2018. The Use of Geometry Learning Media Based on Augmented Reality for Junior High School Students. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 306(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012029

Rusiman. 2015. Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMP dalam Melaksanakan perencanaan pemecahan masalahMatematika ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika:1-2.

Sanjaya, Wina. 2015. Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Shafi, M. A., & Rusiman, M. S. (2015). The use of fuzzy linear regression models for tumor size in colorectal cancer in hospital of Malaysia. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 9(53–56), 2749–2759. https://doi.org/10.12988/ams.2015.5175

Siti Eftafiyana, Siti Asiyah Nurjanah, Marzan Armania, Asep Ikin Sugandi, Nelly Fitriani. Hubungan antara kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis dan motivasi belajar siswa smp yang menggunakan pendekatan creative problem solving. Jurnal Teori dan Riset Matematika (TEOREMA) Vol. 2 No. 2, Hal, 85-92.

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sutarto & Syarifudin. 2013. Desain Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Samudra Biru.

Turmuzi, Muhammad. 2016. Geometri Bidang Datar. Mataram: FKIP Universitas Mataram.

Van de Walle, John A. 1994. Elementary school mathematics: teaching developmentally. New York: Longman.
Published
2022-03-31
Section
Articles