Analisis Kemampuan Investigasi Matematik Materi Pola Bilangan Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin Siswa Kelas IX SMPN 1 Mataram Tahun Ajaran 2021/2022
Abstract
This study aims to describe students' mathematical investigation abilities on number pattern material in terms of gender differences. This type of research is descriptive qualitative and quantitative with the instruments used in the form of mathematical investigation test questions, and interview guidelines. Subject selection using purposive sampling, which is based on the teacher's considerations. The subjects in this study were students of class IX-A of SMPN 1 Mataram for the academic year 2021/2022, totaling 32 students. The test results were analyzed for each item based on the ability of mathematical investigation including specializing, conjecturing, generalizing and justifying. The results showed that the mathematical investigation ability of female students as many as 10 students (62.5%) were able to work on the four stages, the three-stage category was 2 students (12.5%), the two-stage category was 3 students (18.75%), and one-stage category as many as 1 student (6.25%). While the mathematical investigation ability of male students as many as 8 students (50%) were able to work on all four stages, the three-stage category was 3 students (18.75%), the two-stage category was 5 students (31.25%). In this study, interviews were conducted with 6 students from each representative of each criterion of the mathematical investigation ability test results, namely 3 male students and 3 female students. The difference between male and female students lies in the generalizing and justifying stage where female students complete neatly, thoroughly and test the general pattern for the special case they are working on while the male students complete in a short way.
References
Bailey, J. 2007. Mathematical Investigations: A Primary Teacher Educator’s Narrative Journey of Professional Awareness. Dalam J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds). Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the MathematicsEducation Research Group of Australasia. Waikato: Merga Inc.
KBBI online 2008. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. [online] tersedia pada www.pusatbahasa.diknas.go.id/kbbi/.
Yeo, J. B. W., &Yeap, B. H. 2009. Mathematical investigation: Task, process and activity.Technical Report ME2009-01 January 2009 Mathematics and Mathematics Education National Institute of Education Singapore.
Subarinah, S., Budayasa, I. K., & Lukito, A. 2018. Profil Proses Kognitif Siswa SMP dalam Investigasi Matematik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan. 3(1):15-23.
Subarinah, S. 2016. Profil proses kognitif siswa SMP dalam investigasi matematik ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Muhamadiyah Purworejo, 3, 15–23.
Subarinah, S., Hikmah, N., & Azmi, S. 2019. Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Investigation Based on the Variation of Mathematical Abilities. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Education and Social Sciences.
Subarinah, S. 2021. Pemecahan Masalah dan Investigasi Matematik. Mataram: Duta Pustaka Ilmu.
Sari, S, H, 2018. Diagnosis Kesalahan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Dalam menyelesaikan Masalah Pola Bilangan. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajran Matematika. Vol 2 (64): 12-15.
Suryani, & Hendryadi. 2015. Metode Riset Kuantitatif Teori dan Aplikasi pada Penelitian Bidang Manajemen dan Ekonomi Islam. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Prayitno, S. 2019. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. Mataram: Duta Pustaka Ilmu.
Jana, P. 2018. Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Pada Pokok Bahasan Vektor. Jurnal Mercumatika : Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 8-14.
Zhu, Z. 2007. Gender differences in mathematical problem solving pattern: A review of literature. International Education Journal, 8(2), 187-203.
Ahmad, M., & Nasution, D. P. 2018. Analisis Kualitatif Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Yang Diberi Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik. Jurnal Gantang, 3(2), 83–95.