Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dalam Memecahkan Masalah Teorema Pythagoras Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 1 Taliwang Tahun Pelajaran 2021/2022

Zulfa Wahusna; Sripatmi; Junaidi; Nani Kurniati

doi:10.29303/griya.v2i4.247

Zulfa Wahusna Universitas Mataram
Sripatmi Universitas Mataram
Junaidi Universitas Mataram
Nani Kurniati Universitas Mataram

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v2i4.247

Keywords: creative thinking ability, learning style, visual, auditors, kinesthetic

Abstract

This study aims to describe students' creative thinking skills in solving problems Pythagorean Theorem in terms of the learning style of class VIII students of SMPN 1 Taliwang, with the type of the research used is descriptive research. The research instrument used is a questionnaire, creative thinking skills test and interviews. The sampling that used in this study is purposive sampling technique so that the samples were students of class VIII-5 and VIII-7 SMPN 1 Taliwang in the academic year 2021/2022 which consists of 59 students who were then given learning style questionnaire obtained two students with visual learning styles, two students with auditory learning styles and two students with kinesthetic learning styles who were then given a creative thinking ability test and Interview. The results showed that subjects with visual learning styles had the ability to creative thinking which is in the category of creative enough, by meeting the indicators of fluency and flexibility with percentage respectively 100% and 50% but have not been able to meet the indicators of novelty with percentage 8%. Subjects with auditory learning style have the ability to think creative who are in the category of quite creative, by meeting the indicators of fleksibility dan fluency with percentage respectively 75% and 79% but have not been able to meet the indicators of novelty with percentage 4%. Subjects with kinesthetic learning styles have the ability to think creatively in the less creative category, by meeting the fluency indicator with a percentage of 100%, and not yet able to meet the flexibility indicator with a percentage of 0%, and the novelty indicator with percentage of 12.5%.

References

Alimuddin. (2009). Menumbuh Kembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Tugas Tugas Pemecahan Masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Penerapan MIPA, 355–366.

Ananda, R., & Fadhli, M. (2018). Statistik Pendidikan Teori dan Praktik Dalam Pendidikan. CV. Widya Puspita : Medan.

Aripin, U., & Purwasih, R. (2017). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Alternative Solution Worksheet untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Univ. Muhammadiyah Metro, 6(2), 225–233.

Azwar, S. (2013). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (Edisi 4). Pustaka Pelajar : Yogyakarta.

Baidowi, Hikmah, N., & Amrullah. (2019). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 13 Mataram Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018 Melalui Lesson Study. Mandalika Mathematics and Education Journal, 1(1), 1–12.

Daniar, R., Herman, S., & Isrok’atun. (2016). Pendekatan Eksploratif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Disposisi Matematis. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah, 1(1), 231–240.

DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2007). Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Kaifa : Bandung.

Fitri, N. W., Subarinah, S., & Turmuzi, M. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Newman dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Materi Turunan pada Siswa Kelas XII. Mandalika Mathematics and Education Journal, 1(2), 66–73.

Handoko, H. (2017). Pembentukan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif pada Materi Dimensi Tiga Kelas X. EduMa, 6(1), 85–95.

Karim. (2013). Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Membuat Koneksi Matematis dalam Pemecahan Masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 364–370.

Mardhiyana, D., & Sejati, E. O. W. (2016). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Rasa Ingin Tahu Melalui Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. PRISMA, Proseding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1(1), 672–688.

Noviyana, H. (2017). Pengaruh Model Project Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Edumath, 3(2), 110–117.

Nurcahyati, E., Mirza, A., & Munaldus. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Penemuan Terbimbing Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep pada Materi Teorema Pythagoras. 1–9.

Pendidikan, P. P. (2018). Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan.

Purbaningrum, K. A. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Tngkat Tinggi Siswa SMP dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. JPPM, 10(2), 40–49.

Rahmawati, E., Hartoyo, A., & Yani, A. (2019). Kemampuan Komunikasi Tulis Menurut Gaya Belajar Siswa dalam Materi Segiempat. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 8(9), 1–8.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). Parama Publishing.

Sripatmi, Baidowi, & Fitriani. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi dan Kebiasaan Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 1 Jonggat. Mandalika Mathematics and Education Journal, 1(2), 104–112.

Sripatmi, & Ningsih, R. W. (2020). Respon dan Tanggapan Siswa terhadap Komponen dan Kegiatan Pembelajaran Matematika Menerapkan Pendekatan Eksplorasi-Elaborasi-Konfirmasi (EEK). Mandalika Mathematics and Education Journal, 2(1), 32–42.

Susanto, H. A. (2011). Pemahaman Pemecahan Masalah Pembuktian Sebagai Sarana Berpikir Kreatif. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan, Dan Penerapan MIPA, 189–196.

Turmuzi, M., Sarjana, K., & Junaidi. (2021). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis pada perkuliahan geometri bilangan kompleks dengan discovery learning dipadukan dengan cooperative learning tipe Number Head Together (NHT). Mandalika Mathematics and Education Journal, 3(2), 149–160.

Widiana, C. (2017). Hubungan Gaya Belajar dan Kecerdasan Verbal Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP. 30(3), 205–209.