Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Materi Pola Bilangan dengan Analisis Kesalahan Newman Ditinjau dari Inteligensi Siswa
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the types and levels of errors made by class VIII B students of SMPN 1 Mataram when solving math word problems on number patterns based on Newman's error analysis in terms of student intelligence. The type of research used in this research is mixed methods. The strategy used in this study is the concurrent triangulation strategy. The sampling technique used purposive sampling, so that Class VIII B students were selected with a total of 36 students. Methods of data collection through intelligence tests, story tests with number patterns material, and interview tests. The researcher chose two students from each intelligence category to be the research subjects. The data analysis technique used in this research is descriptive statistics technique for quantitative data, then for qualitative data using the Miles and Huberman model. The following are the results of the study showing the types and levels of errors of students with intelligence (1) below average, (2) average, (3) above average who make errors in reading, understanding, question transformation, processing skills, and writing answers successively are (1) 15% (very low), 38% (low), 49% (moderate), 72% (high), 68% (high); (2) 6% (very low), 19% (low), 33% (low), 57% (moderate), 39% (low); (3) 10% (very low), 26% (low), 28% (low), 47% (moderate), 30% (low).
References
Depdiknas. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Haghverdi, M., Semnani, A. S., & Seifi, M. (2011). The examining two approaches for facilitating the process of aritmetic word problems solving. International Journal For Studies in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 137.
Montgomery, D. (2009). Able, Gifted, and Talented Underachievers. West Sussex PO198: Jhon Willey & Sons.
Muthmainnah, R. N & Purnamasari, M. (2019). Analisis faktor penyebab peserta didik dengan IQ tinggi memperoleh hasil belajar matematika rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 5(1), 81-85.
Putra, Z. H., & Sucitra, W. (2017). Hubungan intelegensi dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas V SD negeri 68 pekanbaru. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.18592/jpm.v2i2.1171.
Rayungsari, M., Pusparini, D. A., & Nurmalitasari, D. (2021). Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa pendidikan matematika dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita berbahasa inggris berdasarkan klasifikasi watson. Prosiding Transformasi Pembelajaran Nasional (Pro-Trapenas), 1(1), 347–358.
Slameto, (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Sugiyono. (2014). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sulthon. (2014). Mengenal anak underachiever dan upaya meningkatkan prestasi belajarnya di madrasah ibtidaiya. Jurnal Elementary STAIN Kudus, 2(1).
Susilowati, P. L., & Ratu, N. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa berdasarkan tahapan newman dan scaffolding pada materi aritmatika sosial. Jurnal Mosharafa. 7(1). 23.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2010). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
White, A. L. (2010). Numeracy literacy and newman’s error analysis. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(2), 133.
Wulan, L. R. (2014). Underachievement pada anak superior di kelas akselerasi SMP muhammadiyah 2 yogyakarta. Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling (UNY).