Analisis Epistemological Obstacle Berdasarkan Kesalahan Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Materi Eksponen Dan Logaritma

Sri Wahyuningsih; Baidowi Baidowi; Junaidi Junaidi

doi:10.29303/griya.v6i3.1381

Sri Wahyuningsih Universitas Mataram
Baidowi Baidowi Universitas Mataram
Junaidi Junaidi Universitas Mataram

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v6i3.1381

Keywords: Epistemological Obstacle; Conseptual Epistemological Obstacle; Procedural Epistemological Obstacle; Operational Technique Epistemological Obstacle

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze and describe students' epistemological obstacles based on the errors they made in solving mathematics problems on exponents and logarithms among tenth-grade students at MA Negeri 2 Mataram in the 2025/2026 academic year. This study employed a qualitative descriptive research method. Data were collected through a mathematics test, an epistemological obstacle questionnaire, and interviews. The research subjects were selected using purposive sampling. The participants consisted of 31 students from Class X-3 who completed a mathematics test consisting of three essay questions and an epistemological obstacle questionnaire comprising 26 statements. In addition, interviews were conducted with six selected students, representing two students from each error category (high, moderate, and low). The results showed that students in the high-error category experienced conceptual epistemological obstacles at 92.31% (high), procedural epistemological obstacles at 100% (high), and operational technique epistemological obstacles at 97.44% (high). Students in the medium-error category experienced conceptual epistemological obstacles at 60% (medium), procedural epistemological obstacles at 60% (medium), and operational technique epistemological obstacles at 47% (medium). Meanwhile, students in the low-error category experienced conceptual epistemological obstacles at 15.38% (low), procedural epistemological obstacles at 28% (low), and operational technique epistemological obstacles at 23.08% (low).

References

Baidowi, B., Amrullah, A., & Hikmah, N. (2019). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 13 Mataram Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018 Melalui Lesson Study. Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v1i1.537

Dewi, F., Mahani, P., & Wijayanti, D. (2021). Hambatan Epistemologi Siswa dalam Materi Persamaan Eksponen. Jurnal Equation: Teori dan Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 1-14.

Elfiah, N. S., Maharani, H. R., & Aminudin, M. (2020). Hambatan Epistemologi Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 11-22.

Ismiasih, N. (2023). Analisis kesalahan Siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika melalui tahap Newman. Primatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.30872/primitika.v12i2.2698

Koly, A., Leton, I. L., & Dkk. (2023). Analisis Learning Obstacle Siswa Dari Aspek Epistimologi Pada Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 153-166.

Maarif, S., Setiarini, R. N, & Nurafni. (2020). Hambatan Epistemologis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Sitem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 7(1), 72-78.

Rahmi, L., & Yulianti, K. (2022). Learning obstacles yang dihadapi siswa dalam memahami topik relasi dan fungsi. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 5(4), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v5i4.929-940

Rahmah, N. (2018). Hakikat Pendidikan Matematika. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 1(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v1i2.88

Ramdan., Prayitno, S., Turmuzi, M., & Baidowi. (2022). Analisis kesalahan dalam penyelesaian soal cerita pada materi perbandingan ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 2(1), 194-204. https://mathjournal.unram.ac.id/index.php/Griya/index

Rismayantini, Kadarisma, G., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2021). Analisis Epistemologi Obstacle pada Materi Perbandingan Siswa SMP Kelas VII. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 4(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i1.81-90

Safitri, E. L., Prayitno, S., Hayati, L., & Hapipi. (2021). Analisis kesalahan dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 1(3), 348-358. https://mathjournal.unram.ac.id/index.php/Griya/index

Sari, P. W., Fuadiah, N. F., & Jayanti, J. (2019). Analisis Learning Obstacle Materi Segitiga Pada Siswa Smp Kelas Vii. Indiktika : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v2i1.3394

Sriati, K., Prayitno, S., Hikmah, N., & Hayati, L. (2021). Analisis kesalahan dalam menyelesaikan soal bentuk aljabar ditinjau dari taksonomi SOLO. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 1(4), 597-609. https://mathjournal.unram.ac.id/index.php/Griya/index

Sugiyono (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. ALFABETA Bandung.

Susanto, D., dkk. (2021). Matematika untuk SMA/SMK Kelas X. Jakarta Pusat: Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan, Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Kebudayaan.

Susanto, D., dkk. (2021). Buku Panduan Guru Matematika untuk SMA/SMK Kelas X. Jakarta Pusat: Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan, Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Kebudayaan.