Pemberdayaan Kapasitas Guru dalam Merancang Pembelajaran Terintegrasi Literasi Numerasi
Abstract
Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini dilatarbelakangi oleh rendahnya kemampuan literasi numerasi siswa yang disebabkan oleh terbatasnya kapasitas guru dalam merancang pembelajaran terintegrasi, serta masih kuatnya pandangan bahwa numerasi hanya menjadi tanggung jawab mata pelajaran Matematika. Oleh karena itu, kegiatan ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kapasitas guru lintas mata pelajaran dalam merancang dan mengimplementasikan pembelajaran berbasis literasi numerasi secara kontekstual dan kolaboratif. Metode pelaksanaan dilakukan melalui lima tahap, yaitu: diagnostik dan persiapan, workshop penguatan konseptual dan pedagogis, pendampingan co-design kolaboratif, pendampingan implementasi melalui Focus Group Discussion (FGD), serta evaluasi program secara menyeluruh. Kegiatan berlangsung pada Maret hingga Mei 2026 dengan melibatkan 44 guru dari berbagai bidang studi. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan pada pemahaman guru dengan rata-rata posttest 89,09 (p<0,001) dan effect size yang besar. Tingkat kehadiran mencapai 97,7% dan evaluasi program berada pada kategori “Sangat Baik”. Selain itu, seluruh peserta menunjukkan komitmen keberlanjutan melalui pembentukan komunitas praktisi. Kesimpulannya, program ini efektif dalam meningkatkan kapasitas guru serta mendorong praktik pembelajaran numerasi lintas disiplin yang berkelanjutan, sehingga berpotensi direplikasi untuk meningkatkan mutu pendidikan secara lebih luas.
References
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org
Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society & Education, 7(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515
Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0708-1
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032461031
Johnston, B. (2020). Numeracy as a critical skill across the curriculum. Australian Journal of Education, 64(2), 145–159.
Kali, Y., McKenney, S., & Sagy, O. (2018). Teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning. Instructional Science, 43(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9343-4
Khasawneh, Y. J. A. (2023). An examination of teacher collaboration in professional learning communities and collaborative teaching practices. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(4), 1885–1898. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.4.1885
Lipka, O. (2025). Teacher professional development and pedagogical improvement in literacy and numeracy education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 145, 104612.
Nguyen, D. (2024). A review of the empirical research literature on professional learning communities for teachers. Professional Development in Education, 50(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2238728
Nurhidayah, N., Arifin, A., Sartika, S., & Aprisal, A. (2024). Peningkatan kemampuan IT guru PAUD Sekolah Penggerak Angkatan 2 Kabupaten Polewali Mandar. Rengganis: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/rengganis.v4i1.439
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2018). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Ministry of Education, New Zealand.
Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
Ventista, O. M., & Brown, C. (2023). Teachers’ professional learning and its impact on students’ learning outcomes: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100302
Voogt, J., Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R. C., Hickey, D. T., & McKenney, S. (2016). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7
Yu, T. K., Lin, M. L., Wang, Y., & Ho, C. H. (2022). Encouraging teacher participation in professional learning communities: The role of collaborative performance and relationship performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 965835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.965835
Copyright (c) 2026 Rustanto Rahardi, Meita Fitrianawati, Apolonia Hendrice Ramda, Firdaus Adjie Saputro, Purwanto Purwanto, Mahmuddin Yunus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
